# Get AI Design Feedback on an AI-Generated Website [Open the live Fudge conversation](https://design.withfudge.com/share/get-ai-design-feedback-on-my-ai-generated-website) Last updated: 2026-08-25 To get useful design feedback on an AI-generated website, review the page in a fixed order: clarity, hierarchy, trust, layout, and action. Start with the page's main job, then compare the first screen and key sections against relevant references before changing colors or adding decoration. ## Make the decision from the visitor's first visit Use this five-question check: 1. Can a new visitor tell what the product does quickly? 2. Is the intended audience clear without reading every paragraph? 3. Is the main action visible and understandable? 4. Does the page provide enough proof or context to make that action feel safe? 5. Does each section move the visitor toward the same decision? Write one sentence answering what the page should help someone do. Then inspect the page with that sentence in mind. If the hero introduces several unrelated ideas, choose one primary message. If the button uses vague language, replace it with an action that describes the next step. If the page explains features before showing why they matter, reorder the sections around the visitor's decision. The examples below are useful comparison points for a utility or product page. Raycast is noted as a close macOS utility peer where trust sits beside the main download action. boringBar is noted for a show-don’t-tell screenshot rhythm. Monocle is noted for a restrained utility layout that varies its feature-section composition. Cosmos is noted for an editorial canvas with oversized type and a restrained accent color. Compare the structure and emphasis, not the products' unverified details. ## Captured pages [![Raycast - Your shortcut to everything](https://pin.fontofweb.com/4674?format=jpg)](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-4674) [Raycast - Your shortcut to everything](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-4674) [![boringBar - Taskbar Dock Replacement for macOS](https://pin.fontofweb.com/8813?format=jpg)](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-8813) [boringBar - Taskbar Dock Replacement for macOS](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-8813) [![Monocle for macOS - Noise-cancelling for your screen](https://pin.fontofweb.com/5622?format=jpg)](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-5622) [Monocle for macOS - Noise-cancelling for your screen](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-5622) [![Welcome to Cosmos](https://pin.fontofweb.com/4489?format=jpg)](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-4489) [Welcome to Cosmos](https://design.withfudge.com/share/pin-4489) ## Review the page in passes ### Pass 1: message and hierarchy Hide or ignore images and ask whether the text alone has a clear order. The headline should carry the main promise, the supporting copy should remove a key doubt, and the primary button should make the next action obvious. Check whether headings are distinct enough to scan and whether secondary text is competing with the main message. ### Pass 2: proof and trust Find every claim that asks the visitor to believe something. Mark whether it has nearby evidence, an example, a product view, a clear explanation, or a relevant comparison. Trust does not always require a testimonial. A direct product screenshot, an honest limitation, a concrete workflow, or a visible result can do more work than a large claim with no support. ### Pass 3: composition and rhythm Check the relationship between text, screenshots, illustrations, and empty space. A feature section should show the result of the feature, not only describe it. Alternate compositions when repetition makes the page feel generated: for example, use a wide product view, then a focused detail, then a short step sequence. Keep spacing and type rules consistent while allowing the content shape to vary. ## Turn feedback into a ranked change list Do not hand an AI coding agent a paragraph of vague criticism. Give it a ranked list: - Critical: the visitor cannot identify the product or next action. - High: the first screen lacks proof, context, or a clear reason to continue. - Medium: repeated sections use the same layout and weaken the rhythm. - Low: type scale, color balance, borders, or decorative details need refinement. For every item, include the observed problem, the evidence, the proposed change, and the success check. Example: "The hero has three equal-weight messages. Make one the headline, move the other two into supporting copy, and verify that the main action remains visible without scrolling." This gives the agent a bounded task and a way to judge the result. ## Recheck after each edit Review the revised page at the same viewport sizes and compare the first screen before checking lower sections. Confirm that the main action is still visible, the headline still wraps intentionally, screenshots still support nearby copy, and mobile stacking preserves the same decision path. Check keyboard focus, contrast, readable text sizes, and whether interactive elements remain easy to identify. Open the references below and choose one lesson from each, rather than copying an entire style. A utility page may borrow the close placement of trust and action from one reference, the screenshot rhythm from another, and the restraint of a third. Keep the final page's product, audience, and voice distinct. ## Use this in your AI agent > Review my AI-generated website as a design critic and implementation partner. First state the page's likely primary visitor action and whether the first screen supports it. Then review message clarity, visual hierarchy, trust and proof, section order, screenshot or illustration usefulness, layout rhythm, responsive behavior, typography, color contrast, spacing, and interactive states. Compare relevant captured references only for observable structure and emphasis. Return a ranked list of critical, high, medium, and low priority changes. For every change, include the observed problem, the proposed edit, and a concrete success check. Apply only the highest-impact changes first, then recheck the first screen and mobile layout before suggesting polish. [Install Fudge for your AI agent](/mcp) --- Describe the visitor, the intended action, and the moment where the page loses clarity. Instead of saying "the design feels off," write: "A first-time visitor should understand the product and start a trial from the first screen, but the hero gives three messages equal emphasis and the button does not explain what happens next." Add the viewport you reviewed, the section involved, and the evidence you noticed. Mention line breaks, screenshot scale, repeated layouts, missing proof, unclear labels, weak contrast, or mobile stacking problems. Then ask for one proposed change and one success check. This keeps feedback tied to an outcome. You can also provide two or three relevant references and explain what to compare: trust beside the main action, screenshot-led feature sections, or editorial use of large type. Ask the agent to borrow the structural lesson without copying the reference's product or visual identity. --- Fix the decision path before the decoration. First confirm that the headline says what the product does, the audience can recognize the benefit, and the primary action is visible and specific. Next add or clarify proof close to the claim: a product view, concrete workflow, example, or explanation that addresses the visitor's main doubt. After that, inspect section order. Remove or move sections that do not support the same decision, and vary repeated feature layouts so the page demonstrates rather than endlessly describes. Then check mobile: headline wrapping, button visibility, screenshot cropping, spacing, focus states, text size, and contrast. Only after those changes should you tune colors, shadows, borders, and small spacing differences. A polished page can still fail because its message and evidence are unclear. Rank every change by the visitor action it improves, and recheck the first screen after each major edit. ## Related questions - [Get AI Design Feedback on Your Developer Tool Homepage](/share/get-ai-design-feedback-on-my-developer-tool-homepage) - [AI website review for vibe-coded layout and typography](/share/ai-website-review-for-vibe-coded-website-layout-and-typography) - [Get AI Design Feedback on an Ecommerce Product Page](/share/get-ai-design-feedback-on-my-ecommerce-product-page) - [Get AI Design Feedback on Your Portfolio Website](/share/get-ai-design-feedback-on-my-portfolio-website)